Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Why Wont My Leg Stop Twitching

WARS SGUERREGGIATE




Today comes the news from Afghanistan on 25 September, a drone , an unmanned aircraft that would have identified the hideout of the leader of al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the Egyptian Sheikh Fateh al-Misri, who later was killed by a missile launched from the same drone .
Sheikh Fateh al-Misri was considered the successor of Mustafa Abu al-Yazir in turn killed by a missile launched from a Predator last May.

The Predator is an unmanned aircraft (or UAV - unmanned aerial vehicle) produced by General Atomics , an American company that has seen its skyrocketing stock prices thanks to this particular aircraft.
With a piston engine of just over 100 HP and its lines despite reading the Predator is an aircraft in terms of sophisticated and highly sophisticated aircraft avionics and instruments for reconnaissance.
In fact it is a reconnaissance drone that, thanks to a satellite data link , is able to perform long-range reconnaissance without endangering the life of a crew, flying at an altitude of 7000 meters in 200 kmh for a very long time that can come even at 18 hours.

The feature of the Predator, despite its apparent fragility, which can be armed with air-to-ground Hellfire missiles capable of hitting targets with precision, however small.
HELLFIRE literally hellfire , is the acronym of HEL icopter L aunced FI king and fo R g E t missile (fire and forget missile elilanciato) where fire and forget means that once inserted via databus parameters pointing the missile reaches its target thanks to a navigation system and self-pointing.
The air-ground Hellfire missile, weighing 50 kilos do, has a relatively low cost of production and is used by a dozen armed forces, including Italy, born as a weapon against tank is being built in numerous versions and variants .
In Afghanistan, Hellfire missiles are mounted on Predator CIA until last year had given to Blackwater (Xe hours) - the largest company contractors in the world, an army private practice - the task of managing and arm the drone dedicated to finding and destroying hideouts of Taliban leaders and their physical elimination.

The use of Predator, with other military assets both ground and air, has allowed the destruction of well-camouflaged hiding places among the mountains unattainable, even in Pakistan, and the consequent elimination of numerous insurgents without putting troops at special large risks otherwise inevitable.
Like for example today, 28 September, in South Waziristan, in Pakistan, a Predator missile have eliminated four insurgents provoking the ire of the Pakistani government that rite , often called, has never taken military action to remove the concrete bases of the insurgents within its territories.

Unfortunately it happens that during these actions targeted also remain involved civilian casualties partly because the Taliban used to use as shelter homes whose residents, like it or not, are turned into human shields and for other random unpredictable.


addition to the U.S. and Britain also our Air Force uses for many years the Predator and our contingent in Afghanistan within the ISAF coalition base in Herat, makes extensive use of this airplane only performs reconnaissance missions, because the policy prescriptions imposed on our military does not provide for its use with weapons on board.


This is because in Afghanistan (and elsewhere) our troops acting always according to devices based on the utmost caution, to avoid collateral damage to civilians, damage that could have broken the complex task of co-operation with local civil institutions and to aid the newly formed Afghan armed forces, then these activities are the real purpose of the ISAF mission.
The result of this conservative choice is that no clear victims of civilians by our military actions and the fact that our troops have had very few losses in proportion to the number of military present in the theater - in third place after American and British - despite the continued commitment and hard they are subject.



Therefore q hen dawn on September 17 an Italian Predator has framed the action of four insurgents who places an IED has done all he could do: send pictures Herat has alerted a group of tactical T ask Force 45 * aboard a CH47 transport helicopter escorted by two Mangusta attack helicopters.
During this operation - as is now well known - is killed the captain of the Col Moschin Alexander and the Romans Corporal Elio Rapisarda, the same department, was injured.
Rumor only then would the two Mangusta neutralized the core of Taliban fire, which was perched in a small building, using the on-board weapons (rockets, missiles and a gun barrel by rotating 20 mm). According to the same sources, the building would be destroyed and killed the insurgents, did not appear there were civilian casualties, but at that moment who was able to determine the presence of civilians in that building?
It 'very possible that the Predator has filmed the whole action, but the picture, if any, will surely be classified by ministerial directives.


As would have happened if the Predator of our Air Force had been armed?
You can not make history with but surely if you can simulate a different scenario.
The moment that framed the action of the Taliban with his camera and its sensors could neutralize the armed Predator instantly obtaining the same result that was sent to the operational core of Task Force 45, but without running any risk to our miliatri.


The Predator armed with Hellfire would prevent the activation a complex and expensive device consists of a CH47 transport helicopter with at least five crew members on board with an unknown number of raiders and two Mangusta with four men, but especially the action would get the same result without exposing our rangers and crews of the helicopters risks related to an intervention so dangerous .
addition, the Taliban would have been eliminated in an open space at the same time acting , giving them no time to hide building and organizing, in the time between recognition and entry into operation of the device, what in effect seems to have been an ambush, using also the possible presence of civilians as a defensive shield.

But our armed Predator is not because the Italian government fears the negative fallout from a political and media for any civilian casualties. For the same reason our aircraft AMX only make out reconnaissance and are only armed with 20 mm cannon.
So if one of our patrols on the ground would need air support to get out of some bad situation that could give support, as indeed seems to have already occurred and if available, of other air forces of the ISAF coalition.
In short, our contingent in Afghanistan despite having adequate means for the field of military operations in low-risk and high efficiency can not use them for caveat government, although the mission of ISAF is very different from that of Enduring Freedom and repeat, systematically organized to mandate actions to eliminate the greatest number of Taliban leaders.
ISAF along with the Afghan armed forces aims instead to secure the territory as far as possible to avoid the fighting, when there were, however have seen our soldiers do their job with great ability, for Therefore, during the Typical missions of ISAF contingent for involving civilians are much smaller than the missions of Operation Enduring Freedom.
We believe that the main task of our government should be to expose to unnecessary risks our soldiers by giving them the opportunity to make best use of the means provided to comply with the international mandate was ratified by our Parliament, and for the objectives of this mandate and to arm our Predator AMX does not automatically mean expose Afghan civilians to new risks.
And this without fear because our military has always shown great balance in fulfilling their duty and responsibility.


(*) Task Force 45 is the generic name of the Italian special forces who
work in Afghanistan, the nucleus often ISAF said in the press for his ability and his success "secret."
mission in which Task Force 45 is called "Sarissa" as the Macedonian long spear. The department is made up of men from the 9th Regiment Col Moschin, the Comsubinwho of MM, by the Air Commandos and GIS Carabinieri working together with the ranger Parachute Regiment of Alpine. Montecervino.
For obvious reasons, the information on the consistency of Task Force 45 and their activities are classified.

Monday, September 20, 2010

Cartoon Maxine Healthcare

WHO INVENTED THE TALIBAN? 1


PART
The death of Lt. Col Moschin the 9th Roman Alexander in Afghanistan and the elections of September 18 remind me of a small controversy aroused by my facebook comment on an article on the Afghan situation published by the International and written by Noam Chomsky (*).
My partner - a member of the radical left that I admire and appreciate for its honesty - has panned dialogue with these words ". .. the Taliban are an invention of the West."
affirmation that is to say that the Viet Cong were invented by marines!
is certainly not denigrating the West as the cause of the ills of the world that things will get better in Afghanistan and elsewhere.
Despite all its inconsistencies the West - or if you prefer the western democracies of inspiration - are the places where any human being, if you could choose, would be born and live.
mujahedeen confuse the Taliban with means to have a superficial knowledge of the Afghan situation.
The Taliban have been invented ISI (the Pakistani intelligence services), after the Soviet withdrawal, no longer able to govern the various groups of mujahedeen fight amongst themselves have decided to take direct action to control Afghanistan.
only now they realize that Afghanistan was invaded by the Soviets, not only for political reasons or for its strategic location but also for its mineral resources, measured over a billion dollars, resources that are not manageable from Afghanistan to the total lack of administrative systems.


The first act of the historically proven project management control of Pakistan through Afghanistan to religious fundamentalism has been the attack on the stronghold of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar mujahedeen officially won by 200 Taliban from Koranic madrassas in Pakistan but in reality with the support of the artillery troops of the Pakistan border.
Incidentally Gulbuddin Hekmatyar - double agent for excellence - is one of the greatest ruffians living, personally known to brag of having slashed with vitriol many women in line with the directives Koran and have purified religious Kabul with a barrage of artillery cost at least 25 000 deaths.
The moment that invented the Pakistani Taliban is made, however, soon realize they have fueled a devastating cancer, totally unmanageable.
Today Taliban in the historical sense of the term are endangered, so much so that in the language of ISAF and Enduring Freedom, the term Taliban is increasingly being replaced with the term insurgent.
M of whether it is changed the name is certainly not changed the objectives: to manage the power and wealth by exploiting the Afghan religious fundamentalism at the expense of infidels, that is, whether we like it or not we all Western democratic , including Chomsky and followers!
Even the resignation of Pervez Musharraf, accused of having ordered the assassination of Benazir Bhutto's assassination have reduced the role of the ISI overflowing, while the new president Asif Ali Zardari - the husband of the leader killed in the attack of 27 December 2007 - knows that if he loses the support of the West and the money his office would become even more shaky than it and because of its ambiguous past, the infighting and the economic situation, exacerbated by the recent catastrophic floods.
The other reason that led to the irreversible disappearance of the Taliban is the new strategy implemented since 2006 through a confluence of unreported military objectives of Operation Enduring Freedom, and some nations with a strong role in ISAF and of which Parliament in the second part of this digest.
The Taliban, like the warlords in Somalia and Hezbollah in Lebanon, using civilians as a shelter and agglomerations of civilians as a shield, this is the main reason for the so-called collateral damage, ie tragic involvement of civilians during military actions.
But despite that, between approximately 2000 deaths of Afghan civilians in 2008, only 350 are certainly due to collateral damage as a result of military operations of Enduring Freedom and ISAF, the others are the result of actions terrorism of Islamic fundamentalists against the civilian population not willing to cooperate with them.
In Afghanistan there are two military realities: Enduring Freedom, created after September 11, constituted mainly by British and U.S. Armed Forces and ISAF (International Security Force, Army).
While Enduring Freedom has the stated goal the elimination by military means Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and its followers and supporters, a goal achieved by the escape of Mullah Omar at the end of November 2001, ISAF's goals and objectives are different .
The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) mission is to support the Afghan government that operates on the basis of a UN resolution ..
is composed of an international force, which employs about 58,300 troops from some forty countries.
was set up on behalf of the Council UN Security December 20, 2001 with the task of supervising the capital Kabul and the nearby Bagram Air Base by the actions of the Taliban, elements of al Qaeda and supported by numerous bands of mercenaries from neighboring countries and beyond. The main purpose was to protect the transitional government led by Hamid Karzai to reach a government elected by democratic criteria.
During the first two years, the ISAF did not operate beyond the confines of Kabul city and only 13 October 2003, the UN Security Council voted to extend the mandate of ISAF to the rest Afghanistan.
On 24 October Bundestag (German parliament) approved the use of German troops in the region diKunduz, by sending 230 soldiers, used to be the first ISAF outside of Kabul.
On 11 August 2003, the ISAF command had been given an indefinite period by the UN to NATO, and this was his first assignment outside Europe and North America Alliance Atlantic.
NATO ISAF also operates through the activities of OMLT (Operational Mentoring and Liaison Teams) that is special departments that are responsible for training, even side by side in field operations, the corresponding commanders of the ANA (Afghan Nation Army) consisting of five corps.
One of these, the 207 ° is a mentorizzato OMLTitaliano governing instructors Italian, English and American base at Camp Bastion.

To better understand the functions of Mentors remember that Mentor, king of Tafi, who was the guardian Ulysses, starting for the Trojan War, he entrusted the education of his son Telemachus in his stead.
But this, of PRT and Task Force 45 and the role of Italy in the second part we will talk soon.


(*) Noam Chomsky and since the Vietnam War, the undisputed guru of the American left. Chomsky denigrating the West became rich and famous, thanks to the system he wants to destroy.

There is a

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Which Brand Is The Healthiest Yogurt

Carved


The chess genius Garry Kasparov condensate well in this game against one of the strongest Russian players of that period: Valery Salov. After an opening

seemingly quiet, Kasparov prepare the gimmick that will lead to some moves for a Horse "in taking" the crucial home d5.
Salov prefer to lose a pawn to avoid a difficult game center and calm the fury Combo world champion. But here he was mistaken: Kasparov is not enough and must be treated as divinely demonstrates similar positions.

The pure energy released by Kasparov in this game in my opinion is much more impressive and shows us that, if any were needed, as to become a world champion or top Grand Masters as they say today, it is necessary "not only play well at chess, but also impose their superior physical energy, which can translate into strong will to win, from cover to move.





Kasparov, Garry (2775) - Salov, Valery (2630) , [A34] World Cup
Barcelona, \u200b\u200b1989




3.Nc3 c5 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 b6 4.e4 d6 5.d4 cxd4 6.Cxd4 Ab7 7.De2 Cbd7 10.0-0 Qc7 8.g3 a6 TC8 9.Ag2 11.b3 e6 12 . Nd5!?

A Horse sacrifice that brings us back to ideas typical of the Sicilian Defence. It is a sacrifice "theme", even positional nothing concrete immediately, but a nasty piece of blacks poor coordination in case of acceptance: 12. .. Exd5 13.exd5 + Kd8, and the black king in the center of the chessboard with all pieces in the game makes it very vulnerable position.


12 ... DB8

Grandmaster Valery Salov of avoiding the complications against the great Garry, and indeed for the when the knight on d5 seems bearable because it does not attack anything that is not defended.

13.Td1

Kasparov persists in his knight sacrifice, trusting in this case favorably to the open position. In fact, one of White's ideas in case of acceptance of the piece demonstrates the merits of the sacrifice: 13 ... exd5 14.exd5 + Kd8 (14 ... Be7 15.Cf5) 15.Cc6 + Axc6 16.dxc6 Se5? 17.Dxe5

13. 14.Ag5 .. g6 17.e5 Bg7 15.Axf6 Cxf6 16.Cxb6 TD8!

A fantastic view of the game! Kasparov had won a pawn, but Black was preparing to settle down and his pair of Alfieri made it difficult to materialize of White's advantage. Here we have a violent and well-calculated typical central thrust, which aims to destroy Black's position before they perched.

17 ... Axg2 18.exf6 Axf6 19.Cxe6!

The naturalness and crystalline logic of Kasparov's moves, lead us to the crazy thought that we could play in the same way ...
Not so, because the apparent simplicity of the art behind it has a subtle, often difficult, work of preparation. We come here dazzled by the unbridled force of a single decisive move, but the work was created as a beautiful symphony, is often painful and not without difficult moments.

19 ... fxe6 20.Dxe6 + 21.c5 Be7!

The magic seal of the sample, as a final touch of Van Gogh, briefly explains the situation on the board.
much stronger 21.Te1 that would allow a greater resistance to Black after 21. .. DB7.
Kasparov opens more decisive lines of attack against the black king is not defended, and defends the knight on b6 en passant. Note that in the case of 21. .. Dxc5 is defended by the knight on e6 and Donna White could play the piece simply 22.Rxg2 recovering and maintaining all the conditions of attacks without risking anything.

21 ... Qc7 23.c6 Ab7 22.Te1!

a move of rare sophistication, which effectively puts into play the last piece still heavy sleeper: The Tower a1!

23 ... Axc6 24.Tac1 (Threat Txc6) 24 ... TD7 25.Cxd7 Dxd7 26.Dc4 Ab7 27.Dc7 TF8 28.Db8 29.Tc7 Rf7 +!

and Black surrendered.

One of my favorite games of Kasparov and one of the 10 games that I would take on a desert island ... 1-0