This blog is a meeting point
BETWEEN THE IDEAL APPROACH TO SCIENTIFIC REASONING
CHESS is a serious attempt to dominate
QUEEN OF "GAMBLING, ROULETTE .
"Impossible: a word found only in the vocabulary of stupid"
(Napoleon Bonaparte)
MY BOOK WILL:
"Chess in my way"
subtitled versions secret and travel notes
Features: 15x23 cm format book, 136 pages .
Affordable with a few clicks of the mouse showcase
The book is un'autopubblicazione.
Anyone interested in having more than one copy, contact directly to me, I will provide a discount and personally send the whole.
The book is obviously aimed at an audience of fans / initiates the art of the noble game, telling stories, analyzing the psychological aspects of chess games, and theoretical depth with some hot new novel variants opening.
A real treat for gourmets. I'll be biased? I can hang with what the board to nail?
But if you appreciate the work above, maybe your imagination and curiosity will be asked to
even higher level after reading what I'm going to set out without delay:
CHESS AND ROULETTE: but why together?
Speaking chess presumably, be evolved and thinking (ok, hopefully), I think it is easier to understand how this combination apparently without synergies, may in fact not only coexist, but to develop ideas and unexpected in some ways revolutionary.
My passion for the game of chess has always gone hand in hand with the study of mechanisms of varying complexity to win the French roulette.
My passion for the game of chess has always gone hand in hand with the study of mechanisms of varying complexity to win the French roulette.
Unlike many pundits and theory of the subject, however, I think I stand out because I joined the practice with theory, which in simple terms means being able to recognize a good idea if the game can be successful not only in theory, but especially the test of practice (flow at the tables), and
I will not dwell on the amount of industrial str ... .. we can find online or elsewhere. Many ideas and methods relating to the roulette game are, dear friends, very good in theory, there is only a problem in general: those who gave them birth have only rarely put his nose inside a casino (sometimes never) and do not have the slightest idea of \u200b\u200bthe difficulties that can meet a good idea at the tables in practice a good system can become bad even if it is not thought through the details to be played live!
But winning consistently at roulette is possible?
After years of research, experiments and studies yet, my answer is: you
, and also quite simple, provided you know what to focus our attention on how, as long as you respect our game times, provided you have the rare gift of self!
The method of game that I developed after many experiments and research is something of which I am sincerely proud of, a kind of secret son, grown and nurtured outside of the places
I will not dwell on the amount of industrial str ... .. we can find online or elsewhere. Many ideas and methods relating to the roulette game are, dear friends, very good in theory, there is only a problem in general: those who gave them birth have only rarely put his nose inside a casino (sometimes never) and do not have the slightest idea of \u200b\u200bthe difficulties that can meet a good idea at the tables in practice a good system can become bad even if it is not thought through the details to be played live!
But winning consistently at roulette is possible?
After years of research, experiments and studies yet, my answer is: you
, and also quite simple, provided you know what to focus our attention on how, as long as you respect our game times, provided you have the rare gift of self!
The method of game that I developed after many experiments and research is something of which I am sincerely proud of, a kind of secret son, grown and nurtured outside of the places
common.
A real day program with lots of tables, examples and practical advice not found in any book about it. The method does not provide "jump", foresees only stop any day. The initial capital is modest and affordable for everyone. The results are excellent. The
Selection of stroke to pay less tax on the 0 is one of the strengths, combined naturally to 'unpublished method of attack.
But back to us.
Once in a book by Henry Miller read the following sentence:
"In the world there is nothing wrong. It 's our way of seeing the world is wrong. "
As debatable, there is no doubt that such a statement suggests. In chess the same thing, often not making progress or not we win some games we should have won, simply because we looked at the problem from the wrong side! We learn to control our nerves in the right light and see the problem that we solve.
In my lifetime, often torn between BE OR HAVE
won some nice games of chess, in other I'm lost.
I reached the title of Fide Master and International Master
under rating condition (that ugly word!) In the sense that the International Federation will give me outright when I reach 2400 elo points (given that the three rules I made) that is, ever, given the paucity of the tournaments I play a bit 'of time now. But life is short, and spend it all at chess does not seem a healthy idea, so 'as you may have guessed I like to do and
look in other directions.
Chess and Roulette, have in common?
According to popular opinion, very little, since chess is the game of the triumph of logic, where the element of luck does not exist. In contrast to those who are lucky win Roulette, on the other hand we know, is a gamble!
To me, it makes you smile as well as being false.
From my vantage point the trait Roulette like chess and do not consider it a gamble. I believe that to play well and win at chess as Roulette, one must reverse the conventional point of view and to try to impose our logic, then regulate our ego.
the question: "How is it having a successful method so you decide
to disclose and not go play tenendotelo for you? "
My answer is straightforward and simple: live in Tuscany, away from casino officials, and the environment of casinos I do not" enhance "I can not for reasons
family away from home several days. Despite what it's all been tried and tested by me
also live with very good results and not just in the home!
A real day program with lots of tables, examples and practical advice not found in any book about it. The method does not provide "jump", foresees only stop any day. The initial capital is modest and affordable for everyone. The results are excellent. The
Selection of stroke to pay less tax on the 0 is one of the strengths, combined naturally to 'unpublished method of attack.
But back to us.
Once in a book by Henry Miller read the following sentence:
"In the world there is nothing wrong. It 's our way of seeing the world is wrong. "
As debatable, there is no doubt that such a statement suggests. In chess the same thing, often not making progress or not we win some games we should have won, simply because we looked at the problem from the wrong side! We learn to control our nerves in the right light and see the problem that we solve.
In my lifetime, often torn between BE OR HAVE
won some nice games of chess, in other I'm lost.
I reached the title of Fide Master and International Master
under rating condition (that ugly word!) In the sense that the International Federation will give me outright when I reach 2400 elo points (given that the three rules I made) that is, ever, given the paucity of the tournaments I play a bit 'of time now. But life is short, and spend it all at chess does not seem a healthy idea, so 'as you may have guessed I like to do and
look in other directions.
Chess and Roulette, have in common?
According to popular opinion, very little, since chess is the game of the triumph of logic, where the element of luck does not exist. In contrast to those who are lucky win Roulette, on the other hand we know, is a gamble!
To me, it makes you smile as well as being false.
From my vantage point the trait Roulette like chess and do not consider it a gamble. I believe that to play well and win at chess as Roulette, one must reverse the conventional point of view and to try to impose our logic, then regulate our ego.
the question: "How is it having a successful method so you decide
to disclose and not go play tenendotelo for you? "
My answer is straightforward and simple: live in Tuscany, away from casino officials, and the environment of casinos I do not" enhance "I can not for reasons
family away from home several days. Despite what it's all been tried and tested by me
also live with very good results and not just in the home!
Who is interested and has a way of life close to what I described
can contact me for further details. If you also want to ask me any questions or discuss your systems
favorite, I'll be glad to answer and give any practical advice.
And now here are two games that I hope my pleasure
Caposciutti, M. - Begg, PL [B61]
Forlì, 1993
1. e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 Nf6 4.Cxd4 5.Cc3 d6 Bd7 6.Ag5 7.Dd2 TC8 8.Cb3!?
In this game I have successfully implemented an idea that was suggested by Grandmaster Lanka, which gave me a real lesson in a strategic-tactical game in France.
He basically argues that in this line superteorica the whole theory is to be rewritten! White should castle as long as usually does, not to give too much to Black counterplay, and should benefit from the doubling in f6, skillfully combining positional and tactical threats. E 'word! In this game against a master historical facts are Pisa gave me reason, but of course not easy to replicate this successful concept.
8 ... a5 11.f4 9.Axf6 gxf6 10.Ad3 Se5 Ah6 12.0-0 a4 13.Cc1 DB6 14.Rh1 + CC4 15.Axc4 Txc4 16.Cd3 DD4 17.Cd5! Ac6
After 17. .. Dxe4 would be followed by the unpleasant 18.Cxf6!, While on 17. .. E6 18.c3. White is so entered into that type of position described above, which tended to move from eighth.
Da7 19.De2 18.c3 f5 22.a3 b5 21.exd5 20.Cf2 Axd5 DB7 23.Dh5 Axf4 24.Cd3 AE5 25.Cxe5 dxe5 26.Tad1 TF4 27.Txf4 exf4 28.Dxf5 Dd7 29.Dxf4 f6 30 . DB8 + DD8 + Rf7 31.Dxb5 32.Dxa4 TG8 33.De4 34.De6 TG6 + 1-0
In the next game proved to be more like 3 light pieces
strong women, especially when in the opponent's weaknesses appear permanent structural .
Ancelin, V. - Caposciutti, M. [B01]
Reggio Emilia "B", 1988
1. e4 d5 3.Nc3 2.exd5 Dxd5 DA5 Nf6 4.d4 Bg4 6.h3 5.Cf3 Ah5 8.Ce5 e6 7.g4 AG6 9.Cc4 Da6 10.Af4 DC6! 11.Cd6 +?! (An error of concept)
Axd6 12.Ab5 Axf4 13.Df3 Ad6 14.Axc6 + Cxc6 15.0-0-0 0-0-0 16.The1 Ab4 17.a3 Aa5 18.h4 h5 19.g5 Cd5 20.Te2 Af5 21.Cxd5 Txd5 22.Df4 Ab6 23.c3 Ag4 24.De4 Axe2 25.Dxe2 Ce7 26.b4 c6 27.Td3 g6 28.Tf3 Cf5 29.De4 Thd8 30.Rb2 Ac7 31.Rb3 Rb8 32.Ra2 a6 33.Rb3 T8d7 34.Rb2 Td8 35.De2 e5 36.Txf5 gxf5 37.Dxh5 exd4 38.cxd4 T8d7 39.Dh8+ Ra7 40.h5 Ab6 41.De8 Axd4+ 42.Rc2 Axf2 43.h6 Td2+ 44.Rc1 Td1+ 45.Rc2 T7d2+ 46.Rb3 Td3+ 47.Rc2 T1d2+ 0–1
